Apify vs Bright Data

Both are serious infrastructure and both will get you the data. They come at it from opposite ends: Apify grew from developer tooling and a marketplace of runnable scrapers, Bright Data grew from one of the largest proxy networks in the industry and layered scraper APIs and prebuilt datasets on top. So the real question is whether your hard problem is building the scraper or not getting blocked. Answer that and the choice mostly makes itself.

ApifyBright Data
Core productA compute platform plus a marketplace of ready-to-run 'actors' you can also fork and modifyA proxy network, with Scraper APIs and prebuilt datasets built on top of it
What it's built forDevelopers who want to build, host, schedule and scale their own scrapersData and engineering teams running large, ongoing collection where reliability and compliance paperwork matter
Google MapsStore actors, several of them good, quality varying by authorA first-party Google Maps scraper API and dataset product, maintained in-house
Proxies & blockingProxies are a purchasable add-on to the platformThe core competency — residential, datacenter, ISP and mobile networks at very large scale
Pricing modelMonthly platform plan bundling usage, plus metered compute units, plus actor fees (shifting to pay-per-result / pay-per-event as flat rentals retire)Per-record for Scraper APIs and datasets, per-GB or per-IP for proxies, with higher tiers on monthly commitments; enterprise plans are quoted
Getting startedSelf-serve with a small free platform credit; you can run something in minutesSelf-serve entry exists, but the account, KYC and product sprawl mean larger deployments usually involve sales
Custom scrapersYes — write your own in JavaScript or Python on the open-source Crawlee SDKLess the point; you consume APIs and datasets rather than write collectors, though its browser and unblocking products support your own code
Compliance & contractsStandard SaaS terms, self-serveA major selling point — SLAs, compliance review, DPAs, enterprise procurement
Scale ceilingVery high; you tune concurrency and memory, and the ceiling is mostly your budget and your codeEffectively industry-maximum — this is the tier that supplies other scraping companies
SupportDocs, community and platform support scaled by planAccount management and dedicated support at higher tiers

Choose Apify if you…

  • are building something custom and want the code to be yours — Crawlee, your own JavaScript or Python, versioned and hosted on the platform
  • want to start today without a sales call, on a small plan, and grow only if it works
  • need a lot of different scrapers rather than a lot of volume on one, and want a marketplace to start from instead of a blank file
  • value the surrounding developer platform — scheduling, webhooks, datasets, integrations — as much as the scraping itself

Choose Bright Data if you…

  • keep getting blocked, and unblocking is the actual problem you're paying to solve; this is the strongest proxy infrastructure on the market and it isn't close
  • want maintained first-party scraper APIs and prebuilt datasets so nobody on your team owns scraper upkeep when a site changes
  • need enterprise procurement to sign off — SLAs, DPAs, compliance review and a named account manager exist here and are thin on self-serve platforms
  • operate at a volume where per-record rates drop meaningfully and reliability is worth more than flexibility

Disclosure: where Hubertino fits

Disclosure: we sell Hubertino, a Google Maps lead-list tool, so we're hardly neutral. Both of these are aimed at technical teams building pipelines, and if that's you, neither our product nor this paragraph is relevant — pick between them on the blocking-versus-building question above. Hubertino is only worth a look if the end goal is a finished spreadsheet of local businesses and nobody on your side wants to own infrastructure at all.

Common questions

Which is cheaper for scraping Google Maps?

At low volume Apify, because you can start on a small plan and pay for the compute you use. At sustained high volume Bright Data's per-record rates get more competitive, and the calculation changes again if you'd otherwise be buying proxies separately to make an Apify actor work reliably. Price the whole stack — compute plus proxies plus actor fees on one side, records plus any commitment on the other — because comparing headline numbers across these two models produces the wrong answer almost every time.

Do I need Bright Data's proxies if I use Apify?

Often, for anything at scale on a site that defends itself. Apify sells proxies as part of the platform and they're fine for a lot of work, but if blocking is your bottleneck you'll end up buying proxy quality from somewhere — and that's precisely the thing Bright Data is best in the world at. If you're not getting blocked, this whole consideration is moot and you shouldn't pay for it.

Which is better for non-developers?

Honestly, neither. Both assume a technical buyer: Apify expects you to eventually write or modify actors, Bright Data expects you to consume APIs and handle delivery. If nobody on your team codes, running a prebuilt Apify Store actor from its web UI is the more approachable of the two, but you'd be paying platform prices for a fraction of the platform.

Can I use both?

Yes, and plenty of teams do — write and host the scraper on Apify, route its traffic through Bright Data proxies. That's a common and sensible architecture, and it's a good sign that these products are complements more often than they're substitutes.

More head-to-heads: Outscraper vs Apify · Apify vs PhantomBuster · Outscraper vs Scrap.io · Octoparse vs Apify · Lobstr.io vs Outscraper

Try it on your own niche

Start free with 100 credits — enough for a real lead list. No card required.

Start free with 100 credits